|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 15 post(s) |
Angus McRothimay
Ordo Aetemas Noctis
4
   |
Posted - 2013.11.12 23:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
Like many Eve players I like new toys.
Because it's a new toy I will buy a few of them and not worrying too much about their cost I will venture out to see it they are fun to play with - with the chance making money an added bonus.
Apparently the only thing I have to worry about is if there is anyone in the system with me - as they may be able to "man the guns" & kill the little sucker - but if no one is present then I'm-a-going-to steal your stuff
NOTE
(1) If you have an unattended POS then my larceny may affect you
(2) if you have lots of them - the chance that it's your POS I'm stealing from will increase.
(3) If its fun I'm going to keep stealing your stuff even it I don't make any money |
Angus McRothimay
Ordo Aetemas Noctis
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 15:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
xttz wrote:Infinity Ziona wrote:
If you have a low sec POS you'll be fine. Check it regularly, get your stuff back then shoot the siphon. This will mainly affect big alliances with many moons. The little guy will be fine.
Yep I can see how 1 guy checking 5 towers 23/7 will definitely be more efficient than 10,000 guys checking 500 towers 23/7. The big alliances are definitely getting the worst of this!
5/1 = 5
500/10,000 = .05
No, actually it is 100 times more efficient to check 500 towers with 10,000 guys.
|
Angus McRothimay
Ordo Aetemas Noctis
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 16:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
xttz wrote:Angus McRothimay wrote:
5/1 = 5
500/10,000 = .05
No, actually it is 100 times more efficient to check 500 towers with 10,000 guys.
Really?!!?
Yes really .....
Unless the original statement was sarcasm and you really think it will be "better" for the big corps -- in which case you should try to understand that sarcasm is harder to convey in written communication than verbally. |
Angus McRothimay
Ordo Aetemas Noctis
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 17:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Angus McRothimay wrote:
Yes really .....
Unless the original statement was sarcasm and you really think it will be "better" for the big corps -- in which case you should try to understand that sarcasm is harder to convey in written communication than verbally.
you're right, there was no possible way to puzzle out that was sarcasm shame on you xttz for being sarcastic in print without saying you were being sarcastic
Thanks for confirming the statement as sarcasm.
Personally I look forward to the syphon units, I can't wait to see all the low sec folks venturing into to null to suck moon goo, and in return all the null sec inhabitants descending on low to suck off the low sec dwellers - A veritable smorgasbord for all |
|
|
| |
|